First of all, kudos to the Seattle Times for solid reporting on the ongoing and numerous transportation fiascos around the city. Today’s headscratcher is Rapid Ride, the clean running, wire-powered trolleybuses that are supposed to carry passengers around Seattle’s CBD along its busiest thoroughfares. Seattle voters approved the levy to pay for this system in 2015, and regional voters agreed to chip in via the Sound Transit 3 ballot measure in 2016, so money has been collected for over two years. HOWEVER.... the sole authorized manufacturer has told the city that they don’t have the proper vehicle available.
Don’t you think someone at either the Seattle Department of Transportation or King County Metro should have asked the feasibility question BEFORE they began taking taxpayer money? The voters collectively agreed to a $120M spend on this project and all they have gotten from it so far is indecision, mistakes, and fingerpointing.
Also confounding the situation is the situation is the very sensible decision on the part of the Federal Transit Authority (who has agreed to kick in $60M via a transit grant) to delay the distribution of these funds until Seattle/Metro figure out what kind of vehicle to acquire and how that decision conforms to their original plan. In theory, the routes would be covered by non-carbon emitting trolleybuses to meet the council’s goal for all government-owned vehicles to be carbon emission free by 2030. The reality is, these trolleybuses exist only in the Council’s imagination unless the vendor can figure out a way to configure them out of their existing fleet — a feat that would add tens of millions to the cost and years of delay.
So, regional voters are at a crossroads. Do they accept a vehicle type, probably diesel-electric hybrids, that they did not agree to upfront and that will have carbon emissions and a mushier ride up Seattle’s steep hills, or should they demand a rebate until the government figures this out?
My vote is for the latter.

Recent Comments