Here's an analogy:
Let's say that I'm trying to build a swim team to compete in the animal Olympics. It would make sense for me to go out into the oceans of the world to recruit the sleekest, fastest swimming creatures, right? So my logical selections might be some dolphins, sailfish, marlins, maybe a yellowfin tuna, etc.
Then the animal diversity, equity, and inclusion committee steps in and says, "No, Mr. Reyes, your team is being speciesist as it only includes creatures whose native habitat is aquatic. You need more participants from other ecosystems to meet our DEI goals."
So I go out into the world and look for other creatures that might be fast swimmers like a crocodile and a jaguar and a water moccasin. Not as naturally fast in the water as my other swimmers, but not too bad. We can make this work.
The animal DEI committee calls me in again and says that my team is clearly biased against birds, insects, and desert dwelling reptiles and that I would have to replace some of my oceanic team members with creatures of these protected classes.
So I have to send my marlin and my tuna home and replace them with a tortoise and a pigeon who both promptly drown.
This sparks an OSHA investigation and a class action lawsuit headed up by PETA and the World Wildlife Fund for my failure to properly train and equip the tortoise and pigeon in OSHA approved water safety protocols and safety equipment.
When I replied that I was forced by the DEI committee to bring on these unqualified creatures, they tell me that that's not their problem; that was between me and the DEI committee and that the lawsuit was moving forward. And that I should go find a good lawyer.
In total disbelief, I return to the DEI committee and tell them that I thought that my task was to build the best and fastest animal swim team in the world...
"It is. While simultaneously meeting the equity requirements set forth by the members of this committee. Good Luck."
Recent Comments